Compare InstantPresenter with other tools
Choose between more than 30 tested solutions for your detailed comparison report.
Get more details
Download the complete InstantPresenter test report based on more than 80 features and criteria
The web conferencing solution offered with InstantPresenter reflects a thoroughly and well-planned structure. This assessment is reflected best by the tool”s account manager, which allows for intuitive usage. With the account manager meeting hosts can schedule, prepare, and start a meeting. The optional registration form for attendees serves two purposes: On the one hand it increases security and is an additional aid for meeting reports. On the other hand the feature makes InstantPresenter an ideal tool for webinars, which actually is the main focus of the software.
The weaknesses of InstantPresenter come to light when using desktop-sharing mode. Control of mouse or keyboard cannot be transferred during a meeting and using only selected applications is also not possible. As far as the process of inviting attendees is concerned, InstantPresenter lacks the option of overall integration into local email clients. Moreover, data transmitted during the web conference are not encrypted by default.
Bottom line: The focus of the offered functionalities reveal that InstantPresenter is a tool created primarily for webinars. In areas that are essential to web conferencing, such as desktop sharing and integration into local email clients, the software does not measure up to the standards set by the competitors.
Meetings with up to 25 attendees: USD 39.00 per month; Meetings with up to 50 attendees: USD 59 per rmonth; Meetings with up to 100 attendees: USD 89 per month; Discount of 20% offered for annual subscriptions
Single user license for an unlimited number of web meetings. The maximum possible number of attendees depends on the license.
Voice over IP and phone costs
Only VoIP integrated; a toll-free conference call service can be integrated at USD 0.07 per minute and user
|Transfer of mouse or keyboard control is not possible in desktop-sharing mode|
|The solution is well-structured|
|The invitation process cannot be embedded into local email clients|
|Pricing and license options are publicly available; pricing structure is transparent and easy to understand|
|No official statement regarding encription on the website. An inquiry brought the feedback that Flash Media Tunneling and the manual addition of an “s” to “http” are offered as security features.|
|Runs on Windows, Mac and Linux|
|Overall Score||8.09 / 10|
Review updated: Jan 2012
Price information updated: Jan 2012